I am using SLICK 1.0.0-RC2. I have defined the following two tables Directorate and ServiceArea where Directorate has a one to many relationship with ServiceArea
case class Directorate(dirCode: String, name: String)
object Directorates extends Table[Directorate]("DIRECTORATES") {
def dirCode = column[String]("DIRECTORATE_CODE", O.PrimaryKey)
def name = column[String]("NAME")
def * = dirCode ~ name <> (Directorate, Directorate.unapply _)
}
case class ServiceArea(areaCode: String, dirCode: String, name: String)
object ServiceAreas extends Table[ServiceArea]("SERVICE_AREAS") {
def areaCode = column[String]("AREAE_CODE", O.PrimaryKey)
def dirCode = column[String]("DIRECTORATE_CODE")
def name = column[String]("NAME")
def directorate = foreignKey("DIR_FK", dirCode, Directorates)(_.dirCode)
def * = areaCode ~ dirCode ~ name <> (ServiceArea, ServiceArea.unapply _)
}
To make the Directorate case class useful in my Play application form I am trying to redefine the Directorate case class to have a Seq of ServiceAreas that are related to that Directorate.
case class Directorate(dirCode: String, name: String, serviceAreas: Seq[ServiceArea])
My problem is now with the Directorate table projection. I have attempted to create a method in Directorates:
def serviceAreas = (for { a <- ServiceAreas
if (a.dirCode === dirCode)
} yield (a)).list map {
case t: ServiceArea => t
}
so that I can try something like
def * = dirCode ~ name ~ serviceAreas <> (Directorate, Directorate.unapply _)
but this cannot not work as serviceAreas only goes one way.
It seems reasonable to me that for the Directorate case class to be a useful domain object that it should be able contain the related ServiceAreas.
I'm wondering how I should traverse the inverse relationship so that Directorate table projection will work.
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…