Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
881 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

bitcoin - How do I get market data with MQL4?

I am using metatrader4 and I can get any information 'but' the market data from btc-e http://docs.mql4.com/constants/environment_state/marketinfoconstants

I.E.

double pending = MarketInfo(Symbol(),MODE_PENDING);
MessageBox(
  DoubleToStr(pending)
);

just like the market data on the right hand side of this chart https://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/btce/ltcusd , all the pending buy/sell orders, same market and everything. How do I dump the pending volume using MQL4?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

First, let's start with the <code>-snippet mis-concept

As seen in the provided <code>-snippet, there is a principal error/mis-concept. While the syntax of the MQL4-code is compiler-phase feasible ( it gets processed into an operational .ex4 runtime-code ), the result is principally wrong.

MQL4 has a lot of enumerated constants, which used to have zero context-of-use checking in the MetaLang.exe compilation phase. ( Yes, had to say "used to have", due to the fact MetaQuotes, Inc., recent move into "hidden"-language modifications has changed a lot of system behaviour, even in the syntax of MQL4, calling it in a rather Orwel-style "New"-MQL4, so one has to pay attention to detail even more under the conditions of moving sands... )

As expressed, an ENUM_CONST alike your attempt to use MODE_PENDING, has a fair meaning in the language, but that does not guarantee anything but a compile-time substitution of a value of int. Thus one might state a MODE_HIGH ( btw == 2 ) in any place, where MODE_SMMA ( btw == 2 either ) would have an appropriate context-of-use. These are just symbolic substitutions during the compiler parsing phase.


Second, let's focus on your target

As seen, you would like to somehow operate on a set of knowledge about an overall amount & respective sizes of pending orders, that wait "on the table" before the market turns them active. This is a complex and non-trivial task. The more as FX has no "central" marketplace, to collect the global overall sum of sums.

Speaking about "volume" thereof opens another confusion. Volume, as implemented in MQL4 is rather a discrete integer value related to a cummulative amount of price changes within the respective bar. Thus, on aNewBarEVENT, the Volume[0] == 1 ( the first price-bearing-quote has just arrived & has brought the indication of aNewBarEVENT per se ) and this value is step-wise increasing throughout the live-bar ( [0] ) duration. One may also note, that for bars, where no price-quote appeared "from Market", the MT4 does not show any bar in the graph ( a missing candle ).

So always be carefull on using the word Volume, to assure, one gets it's full context-of-use.

Your intention, as far as detectable from your post, is to obtain an OrderBook LEVEL-2 a.k.a. Depth-Of-Market.

While this is possible, this will require more efforts to assemble, than just a one-liner in MQL4 code.


Third, let's go get the job done

May be, your Broker has an API-service ready for you to collect & process the L2 DoM.

  • If not, go and ask them to open it for you.

If not,

  • change the Broker to such one, who will.

There are other sources to build & maintaing L2 DoM, but the relevance for your Trade-Execution-Venue is to be verified, as some could make your strategy crippled via a MarketMaking role, once trading against your model.

Your Broker-"local" L2 DoM rulez. Always. Not worth the losses to test the contrary.

If getting ready for this task, be ready to operate on ultra low latency architecture, as sub-milisecond cadencies in L2 DoM evolution dynamics are not uncommon.

Once "on the road", you will soon notice, that MQL4 has a timer resolution above 1 msec.

Passive TAMARA-sniffer reads your Broker inter-arrival times (msec) see fastest vs. typical TimeDOMAIN alignments for Hard-Real-Time-System mode of operations

Thus your computational strategy to query+gather+sanitize+process+publish+use your own local L2 DoM mapping has a trouble right from the start ( not speaking about your principal skew of the map due to end-to-end transport latency ).

( Kindly also do bear in mind, that MQL4 has just a few threads, that are absolutely out of your control. Thus a carefull multi-processing design has to be designed, so as to operate in a non-blocking near-RealTime mode. Having integrated systems alike this, your Project is indeed quite thrilling to achieve the goal, believe me :o)

Active SONAR-echo response latency End-to-End (msec) - read the details on Terminal screen

)

Worth doing the job right nevertheless.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...