Here is a C version (in about 38 effective lines) that satisfies the same test as my earlier C++ version.
The full test program including your test cases, mine and some torture test can be seen live on http://ideone.com/sXM7b#info_3915048
Rationale
I'm pretty sure I'm overstating the requirements, but
- this should be an excellent example of how to do parsing in a robust fashion
- use states in an explicit fashion
- validate input (!)
- this version doesn't assume
a-c-b
can't happen
- It also doesn't choke or even fail on simple input like 'Hello World' (or
(char*) 0
)
- it shows how you can avoid
printf("%c", c)
each char without using extraneous functions.
I put in some comments as to explain what happens why, but overall you'll find that the code is much more legible anyways, by
- staying away from too many short-named variables
- avoiding complicated conditionals with un-transparent indexers
- avoiding the whole string length business: We only need max lookahead of 2 characters, and
*it=='-'
or predicate(*it)
will just return false if it is the null character. Shortcut evaluation prevents us from accessing past-the-end input characters
ONE caveat: I haven't implemented a proper check for output buffer overrun (the capacity is hardcoded at 2048 chars). I'll leave it as the proverbial exercise for the reader
Last but not least, the reason I did this:
- It will allow me to compare raw performance of the C++ version and this C version, now that they perform equivalent functions. Right now, I fully expect the C version to outperform the C++ by some factor (let's guess: 4x?) but, again, let's just see what suprises the GNU compilers have in store for us. More later Update turns out I wasn't far off: github (code + results)
Pure C Implementation
Without further ado, the implementation, including the testcase:
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
int alpha_range(char c) { return (c>='a') && (c<='z'); }
int digit_range(char c) { return (c>='0') && (c<='9'); }
char* expand(const char* s)
{
char buf[2048];
const char* in = s;
char* out = buf;
// parser state
int (*predicate)(char) = 0; // either: NULL (free state), alpha_range (in alphabetic range), digit_range (in digit range)
char lower=0,upper=0; // tracks lower and upper bound of character ranges in the range parsing states
// init
*out = 0;
while (*in)
{
if (!predicate)
{
// free parsing state
if (alpha_range(*in) && (in[1] == '-') && alpha_range(in[2]))
{
lower = upper = *in++;
predicate = &alpha_range;
}
else if (digit_range(*in) && (in[1] == '-') && digit_range(in[2]))
{
lower = upper = *in++;
predicate = &digit_range;
}
else *out++ = *in;
} else
{
// in a range
if (*in < lower) lower = *in;
if (*in > upper) upper = *in;
if (in[1] == '-' && predicate(in[2]))
in++; // more coming
else
{
// end of range mode, dump expansion
char c;
for (c=lower; c<=upper; *out++ = c++);
predicate = 0;
}
}
in++;
}
*out = 0; // null-terminate buf
return strdup(buf);
}
void dotest(const char* const input)
{
char* ex = expand(input);
printf("input : '%s'
output: '%s'
", input, ex);
if (ex)
free(ex);
}
int main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
dotest("a-z or 0-9 or a-b-c or a-z0-9"); // from the original post
dotest("This is some e-z test in 5-7 steps; this works: a-b-c. This works too: b-k-c-e. Likewise 8-4-6"); // from my C++ answer
dotest("-x-s a-9 9- a-k-9 9-a-c-7-3"); // assorted torture tests
return 0;
}
Test output:
input : 'a-z or 0-9 or a-b-c or a-z0-9'
output: 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz or 0123456789 or abc or abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789'
input : 'This is some e-z test in 5-7 steps; this works: a-b-c. This works too: b-k-c-e. Likewise 8-4-6'
output: 'This is some efghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz test in 567 steps; this works: abc. This works too: bcdefghijk. Likewise 45678'
input : '-x-s a-9 9- a-k-9 9-a-c-7-3'
output: '-stuvwx a-9 9- abcdefghijk-9 9-abc-34567'
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…