Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
453 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

r - Tidyverse approach to binding unnamed list of unnamed vectors by row - do.call(rbind,x) equivalent

I often find questions where people have somehow ended up with an unnamed list of unnamed character vectors and they want to bind them row-wise into a data.frame. Here is an example:

library(magrittr)
data <- cbind(LETTERS[1:3],1:3,4:6,7:9,c(12,15,18)) %>%
  split(1:3) %>% unname
data
#[[1]]
#[1] "A"  "1"  "4"  "7"  "12"
#
#[[2]]
#[1] "B"  "2"  "5"  "8"  "15"
#
#[[3]]
#[1] "C"  "3"  "6"  "9"  "18"

One typical approach is with do.call from base R.

do.call(rbind, data) %>% as.data.frame
#  V1 V2 V3 V4 V5
#1  A  1  4  7 12
#2  B  2  5  8 15
#3  C  3  6  9 18

Perhaps a less efficient approach is with Reduce from base R.

Reduce(rbind,data, init = NULL) %>% as.data.frame
#  V1 V2 V3 V4 V5
#1  A  1  4  7 12
#2  B  2  5  8 15
#3  C  3  6  9 18

However, when we consider more modern packages such as dplyr or data.table, some of the approaches that might immediately come to mind don't work because the vectors are unnamed or aren't a list.

library(dplyr)
bind_rows(data)
#Error: Argument 1 must have names
library(data.table)
rbindlist(data)
#Error in rbindlist(data) : 
#  Item 1 of input is not a data.frame, data.table or list

One approach might be to set_names on the vectors.

library(purrr)
map_df(data, ~set_names(.x, seq_along(.x)))
# A tibble: 3 x 5
#  `1`   `2`   `3`   `4`   `5`  
#  <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr>
#1 A     1     4     7     12   
#2 B     2     5     8     15   
#3 C     3     6     9     18  

However, this seems like more steps than it needs to be.

Therefore, my question is what is an efficient tidyverse or data.table approach to binding an unnamed list of unnamed character vectors into a data.frame row-wise?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Not entirely sure about efficiency, but a compact option using purrr and tibble could be:

map_dfc(purrr::transpose(data), ~ unlist(tibble(.)))

  V1    V2    V3    V4    V5   
  <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr>
1 A     1     4     7     12   
2 B     2     5     8     15   
3 C     3     6     9     18  

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...