Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
308 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

sql server - Why can't indexed views have a MAX() aggregate?

I have been trying out a few index views and am impressed but I nearly always need a max or a min as well and can not understand why it doesn't work with these, can anyone explain why?

I KNOW they are not allowed, I just can't understand why!!! Count etc. is allowed why not MIN/MAX, I'm looking for explanation...

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

These aggregates are not allowed because they cannot be recomputed solely based on the changed values.

Some aggregates, like COUNT_BIG() or SUM(), can be recomputed just by looking at the data that changed. These are allowed within an indexed view because, if an underlying value changes, the impact of that change can be directly calculated.

Other aggregates, like MIN() and MAX(), cannot be recomputed just by looking at the data that is being changed. If you delete the value that is currently the max or min, then the new max or min has to be searched for and found in the entire table.

The same principle applies to other aggregates, like AVG() or the standard variation aggregates. SQL cannot recompute them just from the values changed, but needs to re-scan the entire table to get the new value.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...