Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
557 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

generics - Difference between ? (wildcard) and Type Parameter in Java

Can somebody explain me what the difference is between these two methods? Are they same? They do look same to me in terms of what they solve. If they are same, why need ??

Method #1, Unbounded

public static void printList(List<?> list) {
    for (Object elem : list)
        System.out.println(elem + " ");
    System.out.println();
}

Method #2, Unbounded:

public static <T> void printList(List<T> list) {
    for (Object elem : list)
        System.out.println(elem + " ");
    System.out.println();
}

Method #1, Bounded

public static void printList(List<? extends Number> list) {
    for (Object elem : list)
        System.out.println(elem + " ");
    System.out.println();
}

Method #2, Bounded:

public static <T extends Number> void printList(List<T> list) {
    for (Object elem : list)
        System.out.println(elem + " ");
    System.out.println();
}
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

They are the same in that they accept the same parameter types.

However, identifying the type with T (or whatever) lets you refer to the type elsewhere.

Edit: Examples:

Your unbounded examples do not make full use of the capabilities of parameterized types. You have:

public static <T> void printList(List<T> list) {
    for (Object elem : list)
        System.out.println(elem + " ");
    System.out.println();
}

And that's sufficient for that example of printing string representations, but consider this (very contrived, and no error handling):

public static <T> T getSecondItem (List<T> list) {
    T item = list.get(1);
    return item;
}

The return type is T, which allows you to safely do things like this, with compile time type-checking:

class MyClass {
    public void myMethod () { }
}

void somewhere () {
    List<MyClass> items = ...;
    getSecondItem(items).myMethod();
}

A named type also lets you share the same type constraint in multiple places, e.g.:

public <T> int compareLists (List<T> a, List<T> b) {
    ...
}

If you did not name the type, you could not specify the constraint that a and b are the same list type (you could use List<? extends T> for more flexibility).

You also asked "Why do I need ??". The real answer is: You don't. It's mostly for aesthetics, I suppose. Java strives to be a precise and clutter-free language. There are many situations where you simply don't care what type you are referring to. In those cases, you may use ? without cluttering code with unused type parameter declarations.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

2.1m questions

2.1m answers

60 comments

57.0k users

...