Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
732 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

xml - Is XPath much more efficient as compared to DOM and SAX?

I need to parse an xml string and find values of specific text nodes, attribute values etc. I'm doing this in javascript and was using the DOMParser class for the same. Later I was informed that DOM is takes up a lot of memory and SAX is a better option.

Recently I found that XPath too provides a simple way to find nodes.

But I'm not sure which amongst these 3 would be the most efficient way to parse XML. Kindly help....

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

SAX is a top-down parser and allows serial access to a XML document, and works well for read only access. DOM on the other hand is more robust - it reads the entire XML document into a tree, and is very efficient when you want to alter, add, remove data in that XML tree. XPath is useful when you only need a couple of values from the XML document, and you know where to find them (you know the path of the data, /root/item/challange/text).

SAX: Time efficient when iterating through the document, gives a single pass for every iteration

DOM: Flexible/performance, gives you more ways to work your data

XPath: Time efficient when you only need to read a couple of values


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

Just Browsing Browsing

[3] html - How to create even cell spacing within a

2.1m questions

2.1m answers

60 comments

57.0k users

...