So I was reading Hacking the Art of Exploitation and in the book, they use the strcpy()
function in their C code:
1 #include <stdio.h>
2 #include <string.h>
3
4 int main() {
5 char str_a[20];
6
7 strcpy(str_a, "Hello, world!
");
8 printf(str_a);
9 }
They then proceed to compile their source code and analyze it with gdb
. He sets a breakpoint on line 6, the strcpy
function, and line 8, but when setting a break on strcpy
it reads the following:
(gdb) break strcpy
Function "strcpy" not defined.
Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) y
I understand that this is because the library has not yet been loaded, so it's asking if he wants to have it as a pending breakpoint. Then he runs the program and continues through the breakpoints:
Everything works well for him, but when I tried to re-create this on my computer, I get the following:
frinto@kali:~/Documents/theclang/programs/helloworld$ gcc -m32 -g -o char_array char_array.c
frinto@kali:~/Documents/theclang/programs/helloworld$ gdb -q char_array
Reading symbols from char_array...done.
(gdb) list
1 #include <stdio.h>
2 #include <string.h>
3
4 int main() {
5 char str_a[20];
6
7 strcpy(str_a, "Hello, world!
");
8 printf(str_a);
9 }
(gdb) break 6
Breakpoint 1 at 0x11b6: file char_array.c, line 6.
(gdb) break strcpy
Function "strcpy" not defined.
Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) y
Breakpoint 2 (strcpy) pending.
(gdb) break 8
Breakpoint 3 at 0x11d7: file char_array.c, line 8.
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/frinto/Documents/theclang/programs/helloworld/char_array
Breakpoint 1, main () at char_array.c:7
7 strcpy(str_a, "Hello, world!
");
(gdb) cont
Continuing.
Breakpoint 3, main () at char_array.c:8
8 printf(str_a);
(gdb) cont
Continuing.
Hello, world!
[Inferior 1 (process 4021) exited normally]
(gdb)
Notice how it completely skipped the strcpy
breakpoint? Well, I asked a friend of mine what was the issue here, and he told me that I was missing the argument -fno-builtin
when compiling. I did some minimal google searching on this argument and all I really understood is that it lets you set breakpoints on built-in functions. So I compiled the program with the -fno-builtin
argument and then tried to re-create this again:
frinto@kali:~/Documents/theclang/programs/helloworld$ gcc -m32 -fno-builtin -g -o char_array char_array.c
frinto@kali:~/Documents/theclang/programs/helloworld$ gdb -q char_array
Reading symbols from char_array...done.
(gdb) list
1 #include <stdio.h>
2 #include <string.h>
3
4 int main() {
5 char str_a[20];
6
7 strcpy(str_a, "Hello, world!
");
8 printf(str_a);
9 }
(gdb) break 6
Breakpoint 1 at 0x11c6: file char_array.c, line 6.
(gdb) break strcpy
Breakpoint 2 at 0x1040
(gdb) break 8
Breakpoint 3 at 0x11dc: file char_array.c, line 8.
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/frinto/Documents/theclang/programs/helloworld/char_array
Breakpoint 1, main () at char_array.c:7
7 strcpy(str_a, "Hello, world!
");
(gdb) cont
Continuing.
Breakpoint 2, 0xf7e510b0 in ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
(gdb) cont
Continuing.
Breakpoint 3, main () at char_array.c:8
8 printf(str_a);
(gdb) cont
Continuing.
Hello, world!
[Inferior 1 (process 3969) exited normally]
(gdb)
Now it works! I have three questions:
- What exactly is the
-fno-builtin
argument doing?
- Why does it show question marks instead of the
strcpy
function in
Breakpoint 2, 0xf7e510b0 in ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
- Why doesn't it ask to set the
strcpy
breakpoint as pending when I use the -fno-builtin
argument?
Sorry for the long thread, I just wanted to make sure everything was understood.
See Question&Answers more detail:
os