I need to create a Zip file that consists of a selection of files (videos and images) located in my s3 bucket.
The problem at the moment using my code below is that I quickly hit the memory limit on Lambda.
async.eachLimit(files, 10, function(file, next) {
var params = {
Bucket: bucket, // bucket name
Key: file.key
};
s3.getObject(params, function(err, data) {
if (err) {
console.log('file', file.key);
console.log('get image files err',err, err.stack); // an error occurred
} else {
console.log('file', file.key);
zip.file(file.key, data.Body);
next();
}
});
},
function(err) {
if (err) {
console.log('err', err);
} else {
console.log('zip', zip);
content = zip.generateNodeStream({
type: 'nodebuffer',
streamFiles:true
});
var params = {
Bucket: bucket, // name of dest bucket
Key: 'zipped/images.zip',
Body: content
};
s3.upload(params, function(err, data) {
if (err) {
console.log('upload zip to s3 err',err, err.stack); // an error occurred
} else {
console.log(data); // successful response
}
});
}
});
Is this possible using Lambda, or should I look at a different
approach?
Is it possible to write to a compressed zip file on the fly, therefore eliminating the memory issue somewhat, or do I need to have the files collected before compression?
Any help would be much appreciated.
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…