linking arbitrary data using GCC ARM toolchain

Question

I want to link in raw binary data. I'd like to either put it at a particular address, or have it link to a symbol (char* mydata, for instance) I have defined in code. Since it's not an obj file, I can't simply link it in.

A similar post (Include binary file with GNU ld linker script) suggests using objcopy with the -B bfdarch option. objcopy responds with "archictecture bfdarch unknown".

Yet another answer suggests transforming the object into a custom LD script and then include that from the main LD script. At this point, I may as well just be using a C include file (which is what I am doing Now) so I'd rather not do that.

Can I use objcopy to accomplish this, or is there another way?

Answer 1

The following example works for me:

$ dd if=/dev/urandom of=binblob bs=1024k count=1
$ objcopy -I binary -O elf32-little binblob binblob.o
$ file binblob.o
binblob.o: ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, no machine, version 1 (SYSV), not stripped
$ nm  -S -t d binblob.o
0000000001048576 D _binary_binblob_end
0000000001048576 A _binary_binblob_size
0000000000000000 D _binary_binblob_start

I.e. no need to specify the BFD arch for binary data (it's only useful / necessary for code). Just say "the input is binary", and "the output is ...", and it'll create you the file. Since pure binary data isn't architecture-specific, all you need to tell it is whether the output is 32bit (elf32-...) or 64bit (elf64-...), and whether it's little endian / LSB (...-little, as on ARM/x86) or big endian / MSB (...-big, as e.g. on SPARC/m68k).

Edit: Clarification on the options for objcopy:

• the usage of the -O ... option controls:
  • bit width (whether the ELF file will be 32-bit or 64-bit)
  • endianness (whether the ELF file will be LSB or MSB)
• the usage of the -B ... option controls the architecture the ELF file will request

You have to specifiy the -O ... but the -B ... is optional. The difference is best illustrated by a little example:

$ objcopy -I binary -O elf64-x86-64 foobar foobar.o
$ file foobar.o
foobar.o: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, no machine, version 1 (SYSV), not stripped

$ objcopy -I binary -O elf64-x86-64 -B i386 foobar foobar.o
$ file foobar.o
foobar.o: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), not stripped

I.e. just the output format specifier elf64-x86-64 doesn't tie the generated binary to a specific architecture (that's why file says no machine). The usage if -B i386 does so - and in that case, you're told this is now AMD x86-64.

The same would apply to ARM; -O elf32-little vs. -O elf32-littlearm -B arm is that in the former case, you end up with a ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, no machine, ... while in the latter, it'll be an ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, ARM....

There's some interdependency here as well; you have to use -O elf{32|64}-<arch> (not the generic elf{32|64}-{little|big}) output option to be able to make -B ... recognized.

See objcopy --info for the list of ELF formats / BFD types that your binutils can deal with.

Edit 15/Jul/2021: So I tried a little "use":

#include <stdio.h>

extern unsigned char _binary_binblob_start[];

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
    for (int i = 0; i < 1024; i++) {
        printf("%02X ", _binary_binblob_start[i]);
        if ((i+1) % 60 == 0)
            printf("
");
    }
return 0;
}

I can only make this link with the binblob if I make that "local arch". Else it gives the error @chen3feng points out below.

It appears it should be possible giving gcc linker options to pass, per https://stackoverflow.com/a/7779766/512360 - but if I try that verbatim, I get:

$ gcc use-binblob.c -Wl,-b -Wl,elf64-little binblob.o
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10.2.0/libgcc.a when searching for -lgcc
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10.2.0/../../../../lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 when searching for libgcc_s.so.1
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 when searching for libgcc_s.so.1
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 when searching for libgcc_s.so.1
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 when searching for libgcc_s.so.1
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 when searching for libgcc_s.so.1
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/local/lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 when searching for libgcc_s.so.1
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find libgcc_s.so.1
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10.2.0/libgcc.a when searching for -lgcc
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

or, turning the args round,

$ gcc -Wl,-b -Wl,elf64-little binblob.o use-binblob.c
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/cczASyDb.o: Relocations in generic ELF (EM: 62)
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/cczASyDb.o: Relocations in generic ELF (EM: 62)
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/cczASyDb.o: error adding symbols: file in wrong format
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

and if I go "pure binary", this gives:

$ gcc use-binblob.c -Wl,-b -Wl,binary binblob
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10.2.0/libgcc.a:(.data+0x0): multiple definition of '_binary__usr_local_lib_gcc_x86_64_linux_gnu_10_2_0_libgcc_a_start'; /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10.2.0/libgcc.a:(.data+0x0): first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10.2.0/libgcc.a:(.data+0x9445f6): multiple definition of '_binary__usr_local_lib_gcc_x86_64_linux_gnu_10_2_0_libgcc_a_end'; /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10.2.0/libgcc.a:(.data+0x9445f6): first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10.2.0/../../../../lib64/libgcc_s.so:(.data+0x0): multiple definition of '_binary__usr_local_lib_gcc_x86_64_linux_gnu_10_2_0_____________lib64_libgcc_s_so_start'; /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10.2.0/../../../../lib64/libgcc_s.so:(.data+0x0): first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10.2.0/../../../../lib64/libgcc_s.so:(.data+0x84): multiple definition of '_binary__usr_local_lib_gcc_x86_64_linux_gnu_10_2_0_____________lib64_libgcc_s_so_end'; /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10.2.0/../../../../lib64/libgcc_s.so:(.data+0x84): first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/Scrt1.o: in function '_start': (.text+0x16): undefined reference to '__libc_csu_fini'
/usr/bin/ld: (.text+0x1d): undefined reference to '__libc_csu_init'
/usr/bin/ld: (.text+0x2a): undefined reference to '__libc_start_main'
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10.2.0/crtbeginS.o: in function 'deregister_tm_clones': crtstuff.c:(.text+0xa): undefined reference to '__TMC_END__'
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10.2.0/crtbeginS.o: in function 'register_tm_clones': crtstuff.c:(.text+0x3a): undefined reference to '__TMC_END__'
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccF1Pxfc.o: in function `main': use-binblob.c:(.text+0x3a): undefined reference to 'printf'
/usr/bin/ld: use-binblob.c:(.text+0x6f): undefined reference to 'putchar'
/usr/bin/ld: a.out: hidden symbol '__TMC_END__' isn't defined
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: bad value
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

The missing reference to _binary_binblob_start is expected from the latter alright, but the remainder are errors related to linking in libc and the basic runtime; I do not currently know how to resolve this. It should be possible via linker mapfiles, by declaring target (file-) specific options, but as of this writing I have not yet figured out how.