As far as I know, do
blocks in Haskell are just some kind of syntactic sugar for monadic bind operators. For example, one could convert
main = do f <- readFile "foo.txt"
print f
print "Finished"
to
main = readFile "foo.txt" >>= print >> print "Finished"
Can all do
blocks be converted to bind syntax? What about, for example, this block where f
is used multiple times:
main = do f <- readFile "foo.txt"
print $ "prefix " ++ f
print $ f ++ " postfix"
Assuming we are in the IO monad, it is not possible to simply execute the readFile
computation twice. How can this example (if possible at all) expressed using only bind syntax?
I think using Control.Monad
is no solution, because it internally uses do
blocks.
I think it it's possible to express this using arrows (using &&&
) -- maybe this is a case where only arrows can be used as a generalization of monads?
Note that this question is not about the special examples above but about the general case of the result of a computation being used multiple times in monadic expressions like print
.
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…