First question on Stack Overflow, so bear with me! I am new to d3.js, but have been consistently amazed by what others are able to accomplish with it... and almost as amazed by how little headway I've been able to make with it myself! Clearly I'm not grokking something, so I hope that the kind souls here can show me the light.
My intention is to make a reusable javascript function which simply does the following:
- Creates a blank force-directed graph in a specified DOM element
- Allows you to add and delete labeled, image-bearing nodes to that graph, specifying connections between them
I've taken http://bl.ocks.org/950642 as a starting point, since that's essentially the kind of layout I want to be able to create:
Here's what my code looks like:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<script type="text/javascript" src="jquery.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="underscore-min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="d3.v2.min.js"></script>
<style type="text/css">
.link { stroke: #ccc; }
.nodetext { pointer-events: none; font: 10px sans-serif; }
body { width:100%; height:100%; margin:none; padding:none; }
#graph { width:500px;height:500px; border:3px solid black;border-radius:12px; margin:auto; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="graph"></div>
</body>
<script type="text/javascript">
function myGraph(el) {
// Initialise the graph object
var graph = this.graph = {
"nodes":[{"name":"Cause"},{"name":"Effect"}],
"links":[{"source":0,"target":1}]
};
// Add and remove elements on the graph object
this.addNode = function (name) {
graph["nodes"].push({"name":name});
update();
}
this.removeNode = function (name) {
graph["nodes"] = _.filter(graph["nodes"], function(node) {return (node["name"] != name)});
graph["links"] = _.filter(graph["links"], function(link) {return ((link["source"]["name"] != name)&&(link["target"]["name"] != name))});
update();
}
var findNode = function (name) {
for (var i in graph["nodes"]) if (graph["nodes"][i]["name"] === name) return graph["nodes"][i];
}
this.addLink = function (source, target) {
graph["links"].push({"source":findNode(source),"target":findNode(target)});
update();
}
// set up the D3 visualisation in the specified element
var w = $(el).innerWidth(),
h = $(el).innerHeight();
var vis = d3.select(el).append("svg:svg")
.attr("width", w)
.attr("height", h);
var force = d3.layout.force()
.nodes(graph.nodes)
.links(graph.links)
.gravity(.05)
.distance(100)
.charge(-100)
.size([w, h]);
var update = function () {
var link = vis.selectAll("line.link")
.data(graph.links);
link.enter().insert("line")
.attr("class", "link")
.attr("x1", function(d) { return d.source.x; })
.attr("y1", function(d) { return d.source.y; })
.attr("x2", function(d) { return d.target.x; })
.attr("y2", function(d) { return d.target.y; });
link.exit().remove();
var node = vis.selectAll("g.node")
.data(graph.nodes);
node.enter().append("g")
.attr("class", "node")
.call(force.drag);
node.append("image")
.attr("class", "circle")
.attr("xlink:href", "https://d3nwyuy0nl342s.cloudfront.net/images/icons/public.png")
.attr("x", "-8px")
.attr("y", "-8px")
.attr("width", "16px")
.attr("height", "16px");
node.append("text")
.attr("class", "nodetext")
.attr("dx", 12)
.attr("dy", ".35em")
.text(function(d) { return d.name });
node.exit().remove();
force.on("tick", function() {
link.attr("x1", function(d) { return d.source.x; })
.attr("y1", function(d) { return d.source.y; })
.attr("x2", function(d) { return d.target.x; })
.attr("y2", function(d) { return d.target.y; });
node.attr("transform", function(d) { return "translate(" + d.x + "," + d.y + ")"; });
});
// Restart the force layout.
force
.nodes(graph.nodes)
.links(graph.links)
.start();
}
// Make it all go
update();
}
graph = new myGraph("#graph");
// These are the sort of commands I want to be able to give the object.
graph.addNode("A");
graph.addNode("B");
graph.addLink("A", "B");
</script>
</html>
Every time I add a new node, it re-labels all of the existing nodes; these pile on top of each other and things start to get ugly. I understand why this is: because when I call the update() function function upon adding a new node, it does a node.append(...) to the entire data set. I can't figure out how to do this for only the node I'm adding... and I can only apparently use node.enter() to create a single new element, so that doesn't work for the additional elements I need bound to the node. How can I fix this?
Thank you for any guidance that you're able to give on any of this issue!
Edited because I quickly fixed a source of several other bugs that were previously mentioned
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 
