No array problem is involved here (even if it seems like that): this kind of exception means that Struts can't find a Setter for your parameter:
From ParametersInterceptor documentation:
Warning on missing parameters
When there is no setter for given parameter name, a warning message
like below will be logged in devMode:
SEVERE: Developer Notification (set struts.devMode to false to disable this
message):
Unexpected Exception caught setting 'search' on 'class demo.ItemSearchAction:
Error setting expression 'search' with value ['search', ]
Error setting expression 'search' with value ['search', ] - [unknown location]
at com.opensymphony.xwork2.ognl.OgnlValueStack.handleRuntimeException(OgnlValueStack.java:201)
at com.opensymphony.xwork2.ognl.OgnlValueStack.setValue(OgnlValueStack.java:178)
at com.opensymphony.xwork2.ognl.OgnlValueStack.setParameter(OgnlValueStack.java:152)
Thus is expected behaviour to allow developer to spot missing setter
or typo in either parameter name or setter.
You can easily reproduce this error by putting an element in JSP that does not exist in the Action.
Since your properties exist (with their Setters) in the Model, and you are using ModelDriven
and paramsPrepareParamsStack
, what I think is going on is:
ModelDriven Interceptor
is delegated to handle the Model object;
- The first time you call
Parameters Interceptor
, ModelDriven Interceptor
has not run yet;
- Then your Action knows nothing about the Model object, and try to find the Setters for your parameters in the Action, NOT in the Model.
- The second interceptor instead runs after the ModelDriven one, and knows exactly where to set the parameters. This is why you have the parameters correctly set in the Action method.
But if this is true, then you should NOT be able to retrieve those parameters in the prepare()
method (that is the reason you are using this stack...):
please try, and post here the result.
The first thing that comes to my mind to resolve this issue, is to place the ModelDriven Interceptor
before the first Parameters Interceptor
(by either copying it, or by moving it, I'm not sure which kind of side effect, if any, it could produce in both cases, you should again try and reporting it here).
Then define the following stack, and use it.
<interceptor-stack name="modelParamsPrepareParamsStack">
<interceptor-ref name="exception"/>
<interceptor-ref name="alias"/>
<interceptor-ref name="i18n"/>
<interceptor-ref name="checkbox"/>
<interceptor-ref name="multiselect"/>
<!-- NEW ModelDriven Position -->
<interceptor-ref name="modelDriven"/>
<interceptor-ref name="params">
<param name="excludeParams">^dojo..*,^struts..*,^session..*,^request..*,^application..*,^servlet(Request|Response)..*,^parameters..*,^action:.*,^method:.*</param>
</interceptor-ref>
<interceptor-ref name="servletConfig"/>
<interceptor-ref name="prepare"/>
<interceptor-ref name="chain"/>
<!-- OLD ModelDriven Position -->
<!--interceptor-ref name="modelDriven"/-->
<interceptor-ref name="fileUpload"/>
<interceptor-ref name="staticParams"/>
<interceptor-ref name="actionMappingParams"/>
<interceptor-ref name="params">
<param name="excludeParams">^dojo..*,^struts..*,^session..*,^request..*,^application..*,^servlet(Request|Response)..*,^parameters..*,^action:.*,^method:.*</param>
</interceptor-ref>
<interceptor-ref name="conversionError"/>
<interceptor-ref name="validation">
<param name="excludeMethods">input,back,cancel,browse</param>
</interceptor-ref>
<interceptor-ref name="workflow">
<param name="excludeMethods">input,back,cancel,browse</param>
</interceptor-ref>
</interceptor-stack>
Hope that helps.