This question is a near-duplicate of 2 others, and surprisingly - while this one is the most recent - I believe it is missing the best answer.
The duplicates, and what I believe to be their best answers, are:
In the end, it doesn't matter what encoding is declared or used, as long as the XmlReader
can parse it locally within the application server.
As was confirmed in Most efficient way to read XML in ADO.net from XML type column in SQL server?, SQL Server stores XML in an efficient binary format. By using the SqlXml
class, ADO.net can communicate with SQL Server in this binary format, and not require the database server to do any serialization or de-serialization of XML. This should also be more efficient for transport across the network.
By using SqlXml
, XML will be sent pre-parsed to the database, and then the DB doesn't need to know anything about character encodings - UTF-16 or otherwise. In particular, note that the XML declarations aren't even persisted with the data in the database, regardless of which method is used to insert it.
Please refer to the above-linked answers for methods that look very similar to this, but this example is mine:
using System.Data;
using System.Data.SqlClient;
using System.Data.SqlTypes;
using System.IO;
using System.Xml;
static class XmlDemo {
static void Main(string[] args) {
using(SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection()) {
conn.ConnectionString = "...";
conn.Open();
using(SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("Insert Into TestData(Xml) Values (@Xml)", conn)) {
cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@Xml", SqlDbType.Xml) {
// Works.
// Value = "<Test/>"
// Works. XML Declaration is not persisted!
// Value = "<?xml version="1.0"?><Test/>"
// Works. XML Declaration is not persisted!
// Value = "<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-16"?><Test/>"
// Error ("unable to switch the encoding" SqlException).
// Value = "<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><Test/>"
// Works. XML Declaration is not persisted!
Value = new SqlXml(XmlReader.Create(new StringReader("<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><Test/>")))
});
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
}
}
}
Note that I would not consider the last (non-commented) example to be "production-ready", but left it as-is to be concise and readable. If done properly, both the StringReader
and the created XmlReader
should be initialized within using
statements to ensure that their Close()
methods are called when complete.
From what I've seen, the XML declarations are never persisted when using an XML column. Even without using .NET and just using this direct SQL insert statement, for example, the XML declaration is not saved into the database with the XML:
Insert Into TestData(Xml) Values ('<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><Test/>');
Now in terms of the OP's question, the object to be serialized still needs to be converted into an XML structure from the MyMessage
object, and XmlSerializer
is still needed for this. However, at worst, instead of serializing to a String, the message could instead be serialized to an XmlDocument
- which can then be passed to SqlXml
through a new XmlNodeReader
- avoiding a de-serialization/serialization trip to a string. (See http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jongallant/archive/2007/01/30/how-to-convert-xmldocument-to-xmlreader-for-sqlxml-data-type.aspx for details and an example.)
Everything here was developed against and tested with .NET 4.0 and SQL Server 2008 R2.
Please don't make waste by running XML through extra conversions (de-deserializations and serializations - to DOM, strings, or otherwise), as shown in other answers here and elsewhere.