Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
469 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

perl - Why do I have to specify the -i switch with a backup extension when using ActivePerl?

I cannot get in-place editing Perl one-liners running under ActivePerl to work unless I specify them with a backup extension:

C:> perl -i -ape "splice (@F, 2, 0, q(inserted text)); $_ = qq(@F
);" file1.txt
Can't do inplace edit without backup.

The same command with -i.bak or -i.orig works a treat but creates an unwanted backup file in the process.

Is there a way around this?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

This is a Windows/MS-DOS limitation. According to perldiag:

You're on a system such as MS-DOS that gets confused if you try reading from a deleted (but still opened) file. You have to say -i.bak, or some such.

Perl's -i implementation causes it to delete file1.txt while keeping an open handle to it, then re-create the file with the same name. This allows you to 'read' file1.txt even though it has been deleted and is being re-created. Unfortunately, Windows/MS-DOS does not allow you to delete a file that has an open handle attached to it, so this mechanism does not work.

Your best shot is to use -i.bak and then delete the backup file. This at least gives you some protection - for example, you could opt not to delete the backup if perl exits with a non-zero exit code. Something like:

perl -i.bak -ape "splice...." file1.txt && del file1.bak

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

2.1m questions

2.1m answers

60 comments

57.0k users

...