It is always recommended to avoid inline Javascript codes by putting all codes in a JS
file, which is included in all pages. I wonder, if this does not cause performance problem in heavy pages.
For example, imagine that we have tens of functions like this
function function1(element){
var el=document.getElementsByClassName(element);
var size=el.length;
if(size==0) return;
for(i=0;i<size;i++){
// the process
}
}
on every page, we need to run the functions to know if there are corresponding elements in the HTML or not.
window.onload = function(){
function1('a');
....
function26('z');
};
but if keeping all functions in an external JS
file, and calling functions through inline JavaScript
, we can call only the functions, which are required in the present page:
<script type="text/javascript">
window.onload = function(){
function6('f');
};
</script>
Doesn't it beneficial from performance point of view to call functions via inline Javascript
(which is of course not best practice) to avoid call of lots of functions, which are not needed in a page?
Of course, this is not limited to functions only, as we have lots of addEventListener
s for the entire website, which are fired on each and every page, where they are not needed.
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…