group policy - Should a GPO contains all the restrictions or create multiple GPOs for each restrictions

Question

I am new to group policies and currently I am exploring my options. In my case, I have created an organizational unit (MyTestAcct) alongside with users too.

Currently I am testing by imposing app restriction such as users will not be using the Task Manager. For that, I have created a GPO (enforced and linked) named App Restrict that removes the Task Manager for users listed under MyTestAcct.

In the event, if I decided to add more restricting features such as setting wallpaper, remove recycle bin etc, should I create new GPOs for per restriction? Or should I append these restrictions into the existing GPO (App Restrict) I have created?

I tried both methods, and both works to my cause, but would like to know if there are any pros/cons between the two.

question from:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65921330/should-a-gpo-contains-all-the-restrictions-or-create-multiple-gpos-for-each-rest

Answer 1

Waitting for answers