Yes it's by design as attr()
is acutally only suppored with content
. As defined in the current specification it's a value for content
.
You can also read in MDN:
Note: The attr() function can be used with any CSS property, but support for properties other than content is experimental, and support for the type-or-unit parameter is sparse.
So it may work with other properties but this is still in draft mode
An alternative is to consider CSS variables where you will almost have the same thing to write but it will not work with content
because it's not a string. For the content you can replace this with counters:
section {
outline: 1px solid red;
display: grid;
grid-gap: 10px;
grid-template-areas:
"a1 a1 a1 a1"
"a2 a2 a3 a3"
"a2 a2 a4 a5"
"a6 a6 a6 a6"
"a7 a8 a9 a9"
"a7 a0 a0 a0";
counter-reset:g;
}
div {
display: flex;
grid-area: var(--c);
outline: 1px dotted green;
}
div:before {
margin: auto;
counter-increment: g;
content: "a" counter(g);
}
<section>
<div style="--c:a1"></div>
<div style="--c:a2"></div>
<div style="--c:a3"></div>
<div style="--c:a4"></div>
<div style="--c:a5"></div>
<div style="--c:a6"></div>
<div style="--c:a7"></div>
<div style="--c:a8"></div>
<div style="--c:a9"></div>
<div style="--c:a0"></div>
</section>
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…