Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
955 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c# - Will .Net Garbage Collect an object that's not referenced, but has a thread that's doing work?

I have the following code (cut down for readability):

Main Class:

public StartProcess()
{
    Thinker th = new Thinker();
    th.DoneThinking += new Thinker.ProcessingFinished(ThinkerFinished);
    th.StartThinking();
}

void ThinkerFinished()
{
    Console.WriteLine("Thinker finished");
}

Thinker Class:

public class Thinker
{
    private System.Timers.Timer t;

    public delegate void ProcessingFinished();
    public event ProcessingFinished DoneThinking;

    BackgroundWorker backgroundThread;

    public Thinker() { }

    public StartThinking()
    {
        t = new System.Timers.Timer(5000);    // 5 second timer
        t.AutoReset = false;
        t.Elapsed += new System.Timers.ElapsedEventHandler(t_Elapsed);
        t.Start();

        // start a background thread to do the thinking
        backgroundThread = new BackgroundWorker();
        backgroundThread.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler(BgThread_DoWork);
        backgroundThread.RunWorkerAsync();
    }

    void t_Elapsed(object sender, System.Timers.ElapsedEventArgs e)
    {
        DoneThinking();
    }

    BgThread_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
    {
        // work in here should go for much less than 5 seconds
        // it will die if it doesn't

        t.Stop();
        DoneThinking();
    }
}

What I originally expected to happen was that the event handler in the main class would prevent the Thinker from being garbage collected.

Apparently this isn't the case.

I'm now wondering whether garbage collection will occur regardless of whether this thread is "busy" or not. In other words, is there a chance it will be garbage collected before the 5 second timeout has expired?

To put it another way, is it possible for the garbage collector to collect my Thinker before it's finished processing?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

No, a thread is considered live as long as it is referenced, and any thread that is running is considered to be referenced (IIRC a running thread registers its stack as a GC root, and that stack will reference the thread).

That said i'm looking at your example and i don't understand where you believe a thread is being spawned?


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...