Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
1.2k views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

php - Is time() guaranteed to be leap-second aware?

PHP manual states that time() returns "the current UNIX timestamp" ? ­and microtime() returns the "current Unix timestamp with microseconds" ?.

However, are these functions guaranteed to behave like that of strictly conforming POSIX.1 systems?

Specifically, do leap seconds get inserted in such a way that the output of time() | ­microtime() jump backwards by 1 second at the start of the next day, (which is the also at the end of the leap second,) giving us repeated return values —as opposed to fresh unique values— throughout the entirety of the first second of that next day?

For example, if we poll time() | ­microtime() every microsecond throughout the span of 1998-12-31 and 1999-01-01, would there be two occurences of each value within the range 915 148 800 <= x < 915 148 801?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

The UNIX timestamp, as you get it from time() in PHP, is a peculiar beast.

It took me a long time to understand this, but what happens is that the timestamp increases during the leap second, and when the leap second is over, the timestamp (but not the UTC!) jumps back one second.

This has some important implications:

  • You can always accurately convert from UTC to a UNIX timestamp
  • You can not always (for all points in time) convert from timestamp to UTC
  • Unix timestamp is non-contiguous, i.e. it steps back. (Or alternatively, it stays the same without incrementing for 2 seconds.)
  • If you get a conversion error converting from UNIX timestamp to UTC, the error will be at most 2 seconds off. (This means you could get the wrong day though.)
  • In retrospect, the Unix timestamp will appear linear. This means that if you are storing time series data and you are not concerned with a single second or two per year being incorrectly represented, then you can consider stored timestamped data contiguous.

Workarounds

What if the Unix timestamp neither jumped backed abruptly nor stayed the same for 2 seconds? This is exactly what Google has made happen for their servers. Their solution was to slowly skew the time merely milliseconds at a time over a long period of time, to make the leap second shift virtually invisibly to applications. (As far as the applications and operating systems on Google servers are concerned, leap seconds are no longer inserted by the IERS.)


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...