It's not entirely clear yet what you mean by making two properties un-equal. By default, two properties can be distinct, so you don't really have to do anything special to let them be unequal. If the question is clarified, though, perhaps more information can be added about that.
It's not entirely trivial to say that, e.g.,
∀a,x . A(a) → (hasFinish(a,x) ⇔ hasColor(a,x))
in OWL, but you can do it. If you want to say this for all classes, you can, as you pointed out, use owl:equivalentProperty
. Now, when you say that p
is an equivalent property to r
, you could also say that
p ⊑ r
r ⊑ p
that is, that each of p
and r
are subproperties of the other. In OWL 2 (but, unfortunately, not OWL 2 DL, as Antoine Zimmermann pointed out in the comments), you can assert that a given property is a superproperty of a chain of properties, e.g.,
hasFather • hasBrother ⊑ hasUncle
which says that if someone has a father who has a brother, then that father's brother is that person's uncle.
There's also a concept called rolification, which has been described more in OWL 2 rolification, which is the process of creating a property corresponding to a class that relates each individual of that class to itself. For you class A, there would be a relation RA that relates each A to itself, and only relates those instances. If you then look at a property chain like
RA • hasFinish
you'll notice that it's really the subproperty of hasFinish where the first argument is an A. This means that you can say that hasFinish and hasColor are the same for the class A by making two subproperty assertions:
RA • hasColor ⊑ hasFinish
RA • hasFinish ⊑ hasColor
These assume that individuals of type A are the subjects of these statements. If A is actually the range here, then you'd just use
∀a,x . A(a) → (hasFinish(x,a) ⇔ hasColor(x,a))
hasColor • RA ⊑ hasFinish
hasFinish • RA ⊑ hasColor
To get the property RA, you need to add the definition
A ≡ ∃RA.Self
to your ontology. In Protégé, this would look like:
and the resulting ontology looks like (in RDF/XML):
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"
xmlns="http://example.org/ep#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
<owl:Ontology rdf:about="http://example.org/ep"/>
<owl:Class rdf:about="http://example.org/ep#A">
<owl:equivalentClass>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty>
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="http://example.org/ep#R_A"/>
</owl:onProperty>
<owl:hasSelf rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#boolean"
>true</owl:hasSelf>
</owl:Restriction>
</owl:equivalentClass>
</owl:Class>
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="http://example.org/ep#hasFinish">
<owl:propertyChainAxiom rdf:parseType="Collection">
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="http://example.org/ep#R_A"/>
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="http://example.org/ep#hasColor"/>
</owl:propertyChainAxiom>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="http://example.org/ep#hasColor">
<owl:propertyChainAxiom rdf:parseType="Collection">
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="http://example.org/ep#R_A"/>
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="http://example.org/ep#hasFinish"/>
</owl:propertyChainAxiom>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
</rdf:RDF>
and in Turtle:
@prefix : <http://example.org/ep#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
:hasFinish a owl:ObjectProperty ;
owl:propertyChainAxiom ( :R_A :hasColor ) .
:A a owl:Class ;
owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction ;
owl:hasSelf true ;
owl:onProperty :R_A
] .
:hasColor a owl:ObjectProperty ;
owl:propertyChainAxiom ( :R_A :hasFinish ) .
<http://example.org/ep>
a owl:Ontology .
:R_A a owl:ObjectProperty .