Given that you indicated that there are actual multiple variables you need to either filter for NA
or not, you could do this using standard evaluation via filter_
and some help from package lazyeval.
library(dplyr)
library(lazyeval)
The algorithm would be something like this:
First, for each of your check boxes that you want to either remove the missing values or keep them, you would make a reactive statement in server.r
kind of like in your question, except it would either return NULL
or the variable name from the dataset you are using as a string.
Coupon_Select <- reactive({
if(input$checkbox){"Coupon"}
else {NULL}
})
Sale_Select <- reactive({
if(input$checkbox2){"Sale"}
else {NULL}
})
You'll use the output of these reactive functions in your Data_Select
reactive function. In this step, you'll concatenate the check box reactive result together into a vector or list and then loop through them with lapply
to set up the condition for each variable for use in filter_
. This involves using interp
from package lazyeval much as in this answer. Note that this works when using the same condition for each variable (removing rows that contain missing values for those particular variables).
The output list of conditions to filter on can be used in the .dots
argument of filter_
. I added the filter_
as a second filtering step, so the other conditions that you will always have can still easily be done via filter
.
dataInput = reactive({
extrafilt = c(Coupon_Select(), Sale_Select())
dots = lapply(extrafilt, function(cols) interp(~!is.na(x),
.values = list(x = as.name(cols))))
Orders %>%
filter(Region %in% Region_Select(), Community.Type %in% Type_Select()) %>%
filter_(.dots = dots)
})
I found it particularly useful that this works when all check box reactive functions return NULL
and you don't need any additional filtering.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…